Peterson v. Chaix
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, and from an order denying a new trial. Emmett Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion
Action upon a contract for the sale of certain grapes. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and plaintiffs had judgment, from which and from the order denying their motion for a new trial defendants appeal.
It is averred in the complaint that on September 22, 1902, plaintiffs entered into a contract with defendants whereby plaintiffs agreed to sell and deliver to defendants at their winery in Santa Rosa, and defendants agreed to buy and receive, the crop of grapes owned and grown by plaintiffs on their vineyards near said city, for the season of 1902, said grapes to be of sound…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Fawkner v. Lew Smith Wall Paper Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Johnson v. PughWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Holland v. ReaMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Harrell v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1857
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.