Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ramey Bor. v. Com., Dept. of Env. Res.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 1976No. 204PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

On April 6, 1973, the Department of Environmental Resources (DER) ordered 1 Ramey Borough to plan, design, construct and operate a waste-water treatment facility. The DER found that approximately 90 of 200 homes in Ramey do not have septic tanks. Waste from these residences is discharged into a sewer which empties into Little Muddy Run, a tributary of Muddy Run which flows into the west branch of the Susquehanna River.

The borough appealed the order to the Environmental Hearing Board. On December 31, 1973, the board dismissed the borough’s appeal and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Harmar Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. Barnes & Tucker Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. DERRY TP., ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Triolo v. ExleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Williams v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Barnes & Tucker Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Norwin School District v. BelanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Hoolick v. Retreat State HospitalCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Piambino v. Bestline Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1986
  5. Summerhill Borough v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API