Legal Opinion
United States v. Kreutzer
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided February 2, 2012No. 11-0231/ARPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review to determine whether Appellant was entitled to additional confinement credit under Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 305, or Article 13, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 813 (2006), after prison officials at the United States Disciplinary Barracks retained Appellant on death row despite the United States *445Army Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) setting aside Appellant’s death sentence. We hold that Appellant was not entitled to such credit because he was still subject to lawful confinement as a prisoner found…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. KreutzerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. InongCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- Public Lands Council v. BabbittSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. ClarkNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. BufordUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. ClarkNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. ClarkNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. KatsoUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.