Legal Opinion

Rankins v. Rankins

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 1942No. Civ. 13582PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS (Jess E.), J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order made after judgment. The facts, as they appear from the clerk’s transcript and particularly from the affidavits therein, may be briefly stated as follows:

Plaintiff, Leola Rankins, brought an action seeking custody and support of the minor child of herself and defendant Oscar Rankins, and was awarded judgment ordering said defendant to pay the sum of $20 per month for the support of the minor. Defendant became delinquent in his payments and execution issued for $978. Rankins is (or was at that time) a professional prizefighter, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gird v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Yager v. YagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Bruton v. TearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Gaskins v. Security-First National, BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. In Re SmallboneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bagnall v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Ogle v. HeimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Henry v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Avilla v. AvillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. White v. WhiteMontana Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API