Legal Opinion

In Re Smallbone

California Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1940No. Crim. 4316PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, J., pro tem.

By this proceeding in habeas corpus the petitioner seeks his discharge from custody under a judgment committing him for his failure and refusal to pay support money due to his former wife under a final decree of divorce entered on January 14, 1938.

Petitioner is a retired employee of the city and county of San Francisco, wherein the decree of divorce and the adjudication in contempt were had. As such retired employee he is entitled to a monthly pension of $100. Several of petitioner’s pension installments have accumulated with the pension board, due, so petitioner asserts,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yager v. YagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Zwingmann v. ZwingmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Bruton v. TearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Monck v. MonckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Udall Ex Rel. State Treasurer v. UdallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Krokyn v. KrokynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Ogle v. HeimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. In Re DudleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
  5. Thomas v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API