Legal Opinion

Stubenrouch v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1988No. 53036PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL R. GAERTNER, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted of robbery in the first degree and sentenced to twenty years. After this court denied his direct appeal, State v. Stubenrouch, 702 S.W.2d 926 (Mo.App.1985), movant filed a Rule 27.26 motion for postconviction relief. An eviden-tiary hearing was held on October 17, 1986 and the motion was denied on April 13, 1987. Movant appeals this denial, claiming that the court erred in failing to find: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State v. LaRetteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. State v. HarveySupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. MintonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Stevens v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API