Legal Opinion

Hill v. St. Paul Federal Bank for Savings

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 2002No. 1—00—2226, 1—00—3622, 1—00—3769 consPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cerda

In this consolidated appeal, plaintiffs, Daron A. Hill, Scott Shepard, and Maris V Lidaka, appeal from the dismissal of their respective class action complaints alleging the illegality of the practice of defendants, St. Paul Federal Bank for Savings, Harris Bank Elk Grove, N.A., and Corns Bank, N.A., respectively, in posting overdrawn checks in the order of highest to lowest amount, resulting in some cases in more overdraft fees than if the lowest checks were posted first. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Shepard alleged that on January 20, 2000, he had $126.02 in his checking account when the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Travelers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mt. Zion State Bank & Trust v. Consolidated Communications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Saunders v. Michigan Avenue National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. Resolution Trust Corp. v. HoltzmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Price v. Philip Morris, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
  3. Fox v. HeimannAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Fetter v. Wells Fargo Bank Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  5. Schulte v. Fifth Third BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API