Legal Opinion

Jungnitsch v. Michigan Malleable Iron Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Case by Oscar Jungnitsch against the Michigan Malleable Iron Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Per curiam

The plaintiff sues to recover damages for negligent injury. The defense of a former suit in bar was sustained by the circuit court, and plaintiff has brought error. It appears that the plaintiff, by his next friend, brought a former action before the circuit court of Wayne county to recover for the same injury, imputing negligence to the defendant in different counts, in one of which the same breach of duty as is set up in this action was averred. On the trial the court ruled that the breach of duty which is set up in this action did not entitle the plaintiff to a verdict. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Barker v. ClevelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Detroit, Lansing & Northern Railroad v. McCammonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Pierson v. ConleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Kellogg v. Thompson's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDannel v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Shank v. CastleMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. La Vasser v. Chesbrough Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Steinbach v. BauclairNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API