Legal Opinion

Wm J. Schmitt, Inc. v. Penfield Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 5, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: These cross appeals raise questions under section 3813 of the Education Law concerning the timeliness and sufficiency of a notice of claim allegedly filed by plaintiff in June, 1974. Special Term held that a notice sufficient in form had been filed and that a question of fact was raised as to whether the defendant had received it. We accept the reasoning of the court on that point. On this appeal defendant argues for the first time that the notice was not served within three months of the date the claim accrued. In 1972 plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between the Board of Education & Wager Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Waterman v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  3. Shalman v. Board of Education of Central School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carthage Central School District No. 1 v. Reddick & Sons of Gouverneur, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Polce v. Clinton Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Grand Island Central School District v. Transcom Equipment Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Blue Cross of Western New York, Inc. v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Chem Construction Corp. v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API