Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Cooley

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1998No. 97-1764PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge NIEMEYER joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Chief Judge:

Barrie and Nancy Peterson sued William Cooley, Mid-Pacific Funding Corporation, and C.F. Trust, Inc. for tortious interference with contractual relations and statutory conspiracy to injure their business, Va.Code Ann. § 18.2-499. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants on the grounds that no contract existed and that the defendants acted properly in pursuit of legitimate business purposes. The Petersons appeal,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Industrial Tectonics, Inc. v. Aero Alloy, a California Corporation Die Cast Products, Inc., a California Corporation, AKA Metal Products GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Chaves v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  3. Duggin v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  4. Allen Realty Corp. v. HolbertSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. Commercial Business Systems, Inc. v. BellSouth Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Central West Virginia Energy Co. v. Mountain State Carbon, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  2. Long v. SilverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  3. Athena Automotive, Incorporated v. John J. Digregorio J & D Automotive, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. Ferrell v. Express Check Advance of SC LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  5. Johnson v. Nutrex Research, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API