Legal Opinion
United States v. Wayne Randell Anglian
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 5, 1986No. 85-5381PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
The primary dispute on this appeal concerns the standards that govern an order of restitution for co-conspirators under the *766Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 (the “VWPA”). 18 U.S.C. §§ 3579, 3580 (1982). Appellant Wayne Anglian challenges a sentencing order that requires him to pay a proportionately greater share in restitution than all but one of his co-defendants. Anglian also asserts that his confession, entered into evidence against him, was not voluntary and should not have been admitted. We affirm.
I
Section 3579 of the VWPA permits a trial court,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Joseph PalmaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Ronald v. CloudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,709 United States of America v. Christopher Arutunoff, United States of America v. Steven J. Devries, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. James B. Frost (89-5144/5145) and Charles L. Griffin (89-5146/5147)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Helen L. Lively, A/K/A Helen FluggaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Juan Jackson and Genaro CamachoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.