Legal Opinion

Antwone Shaw v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 23, 2015No. 14-5406Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge.

Antwone Shaw sought re-sentencing under Dorsey v. United States, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2321, 183 L.Ed.2d 250 (2012), by filing a motion to correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Shaw argued that the Fair Sentencing Act (FSA) took effect before he was sentenced, entitling him to the benefit of the five-year, not the ten-year, statutory minimum sentence. Because applying the FSA’s lower statutory minimum would not have resulted in a lower sentence for Shaw, we AFFIRM the district court’s denial of the § 2255 motion.

I. BACKGROUND

In late July 2010, Shaw…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Barrett N. Weinberger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. CarradineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API