In re MH 2007-001895
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KESSLER, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant, L.R., appeals the decision of the superior court finding that as a result of a mental disorder she was persistently and acutely disabled and in need of psychiatric *348treatment as ordered by the court. Appellant argues that she was denied due process and a fair hearing because of the interpretation services she received at her hearing. She argues the interpreter provided at the hearing was not sufficiently qualified to interpret and there is no way to determine if there was a continuous simultaneous interpretation of the testimony. We affirm because Appellant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- McDowell Mountain Ranch Land Coalition v. VizcainoArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Mh2009-002120Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- In Re Mh Xxxx-XxxxxxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009