H. Koehler & Co. v. Reinheimer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, H. Koehler & Co., from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 20th day of April, 1891, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial before the court without a jury at the New York Trial Term dismissing the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Rumsey, J.:
The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the general law of 1848 (Chap. 40), and the objects for which it- is organized are the manufacture and sale of various kinds of ales and beer. In the month of November, 1890, certain infants, the owners of a building in this city, were, by their special guardian, about to lease the premises to one Hyland to be used as a saloon for the sale of beer. The plaintiff corporation had agreed to guarantee the performance of the covenants of the lease by Hyland. Before that was doné, however, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Whitney Arms Co. v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Bath Gas Light Co. v. . ClaffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Arnold v. President, Managers & Co. of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Holm v. Claus Lipsius Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Fuld v. Burr Brewing Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McKinley v. . HessenNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Hess v. W. & J. SloaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- McQuaide v. Enterprise Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
- Depot Realty Syndicate v. Enterprise Brewing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Chester Airport, Inc. v. Aeroflex Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.