Legal Opinion
Aktar v. Anderson
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1997No. Docket Nos. B101267, B106453PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Defendant and appellant Eloise Anderson, Director of the California Department of Social Services, and the California Department of Social Services (hereafter, the Department), appeal an order granting a preliminary injunction in favor of plaintiffs and respondents Mustari Aktar, Ingrid Monakil, Henrietta Russell, and all persons similarly situated (hereafter, Aktar). The Department also filed a petition for writ of mandate requesting this court to dissolve the preliminary injunction. The two matters have been consolidated.
The trial court enjoined the Department from…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Coalition v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Plotkin v. SAJAHTERA, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Souders v. Philip Morris Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Aktar v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Opinion No. (2003), California Attorney General Reports2003