Legal Opinion

(PS) Rouse v. Beltran

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 16, 2021No. 2:21-cv-01085Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 XEZAKIA ROUSE, No. 2:21–cv–1085–JAM–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF (ECF Nos. 2, 6) STATE,1 15 Defendant. 16 17 Still pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) 18 which he filed with his original complaint on June 21, 2021.2 (ECF Nos. 1-2.) The undersigned 19 declined to rule on the IFP motion initially because it appeared that this district, the Eastern 20 District of California, might not be the proper venue…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API