Legal Opinion

Bates v. Anderson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 5, 1992PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

The plaintiff, Phyllis Bates, appeals, and the defendant, Robert Anderson d/b/a F.A. Peabody Company (Peabody), cross-appeals from a judgment for Peabody entered in the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Pierson, J) notwithstanding a jury verdict in favor of Bates on her complaint against Peabody. We agree with Bates that the evidence in this case is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict that Peabody had breached its contract with Bates to secure flood insurance on her home, and we vacate the judgment. Accordingly, we need not address Bates’s further contention that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Poirier v. HayesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Agway, Inc. v. ErnstSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. Roy v. DanisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. Schiavi v. GoodwinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. June Roberts Agency, Inc. v. Venture Properties, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Forrest Associates v. Passamaquoddy TribeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. Sullivan v. PorterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  4. Merriam v. WangerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. County Forest Products, Inc. v. Green Mountain Agency, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API