Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Swanson v. Civil Commitment Unit for Sex Offenders

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 17, 2007No. 05-0845Published

1ConcurrenceAppel, J.

(specially concurring).

I specially concur in the outcome of this case. I write separately because I believe the majority applies the wrong legal framework to resolve the issue presented in this appeal.

In his petition, Swanson seeks judicial review of a final agency action, which held that he was not entitled to a contested case hearing in connection with disciplinary matters under the applicable administrative procedures. He desires an evidentia-ry hearing before the agency to determine the validity of the underlying discipline.

These claims were brought under the Iowa Administrative…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. James Carl Higgs v. William E. Carver and James M. WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. City of Des Moines v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. Polk County Iowa v. Iowa State Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API