Swanson v. Civil Commitment Unit for Sex Offenders
Supreme Court of Iowa
1ConcurrenceAppel, J.
(specially concurring).
I specially concur in the outcome of this case. I write separately because I believe the majority applies the wrong legal framework to resolve the issue presented in this appeal.
In his petition, Swanson seeks judicial review of a final agency action, which held that he was not entitled to a contested case hearing in connection with disciplinary matters under the applicable administrative procedures. He desires an evidentia-ry hearing before the agency to determine the validity of the underlying discipline.
These claims were brought under the Iowa Administrative…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- James Carl Higgs v. William E. Carver and James M. WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- City of Des Moines v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Polk County Iowa v. Iowa State Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.