Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martin v. Stillie

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 5, 1930No. 28,476 and No. 28,762Published

1DissentJochems, J.

I am not entirely unsympathetic with the attitude of the majority of the court in this case. Nor am I unappreciative of the annoyance caused by its frequent appearance in this court. It seems that no matter what we do — like Banquo’s ghost — this Stillie case continues to haunt us and will not down. Again, it is like the scarlet spot on Lady Macbeth’s hand. To paraphrase the words of that conscience-bedeviled woman, we may re*300peat again and again: “Out, damned Stillie case. Out!” and yet it will not “out.”

I do not believe in the “nuisance” method of terminating litigation. It is not sound. So…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MerrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Martin v. StillieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Hudson v. RileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API