John C. Sheehan v. Doyle
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
In this appeal, Doyle questions the wisdom of our decision in Sheehan v. Doyle, 513 F.2d 895 (1st Cir. 1975). In that case, Sheehan had sought documentary discovery from Doyle, and the latter had defended on grounds that Doyle, a nonresident alien, was beyond the jurisdiction and venue of the district court. We sustained Doyle, but on the ground that 35 U.S.C. § 24 “does not confer jurisdiction upon the district court, acting on its own, to grant Rule 34 discovery directly, whether against a nonresident alien or a resident citizen.” 513 F.2d at 898. In this, we relied heavily on the en banc…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- John C. Sheehan v. Frank P. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Vincent J. Frilette, and Paul R. Weisz, Movants-Appellants v. Charles N. Kimberlin, Jr., and Elroy M. Gladrow, Opposers. Richard J. Duffy v. Gerald Barnes, Joseph R. Preziosi, William F. McGuinness James B. Duke,richard A. Craig, Charles C. Faroni, Richard Baubles and Donald Sager,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
3Cited by5 opinions
- Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. Braddick, Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. BraddickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- In Re WORKSITE INSPECTION OF QUALITY PRODUCTS, INC., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- El Encanto, Inc. v. Hatch Chile Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Rosenruist-Gestao E Servicos LDA v. Virgin Enterprises Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Rosenruist-Gestao E Servicos LDA v. Virgin Enterprises Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007