Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rosenruist-Gestao E Servicos LDA v. Virgin Enterprises Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 27, 2007No. 06-1588Published

1DissentWilkinson, Circuit Judge

In a first for any federal court, my colleagues hold that a foreign company that has no United States employees, locations, or business activities must produce a designee to testify at a deposition in the Eastern District of Virginia so long as it has applied for trademark registration with a government office located there. 35 U.S.C. § 24 (2000). As a result, foreign witnesses can be compelled to travel to the United States and give in-person deposition testimony at the behest of any litigant in a trademark dispute, “for use in any contested case in the Patent and Trademark Office” (“PTO”) —…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional De Marineros De HondurasSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API