Legal Opinion
Kilduff v. Kalinowski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 14, 1950PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiff had a verdict for damages in an action for malicious injury which allegedly resulted in personal injuries to his intestate. The trial court set the verdict aside on the ground that the element of proximate cause was not proven. The plaintiff appealed from this ruling. This is the only assignment of error.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts: Raymond, who is the plaintiff administrator, his brother James and their mother Helen Kilduff lived together in a five-room apartment on the fourth floor of a building on State Street in New Haven owned by the defendant.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Corey v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Mourison v. HansenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Patricia Johnson v. Teamsters Local 559, Patricia Johnson v. Teamsters Local 559Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Colucci v. PinetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Connecticut Savings Bank v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.