Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Iwachiw
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 8, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action asserting claims under Labor Law §§ 200, 240 (1), and § 241 (6), and a common-law negligence cause of action based on injuries he sustained when he slipped and fell from a roof. Plaintiff’s employer was hired by defendants Roman Iwachiw and Nadia Iwachiw to build a roof on their new home. Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of the Iwachiws for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against them and in granting that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bartoo v. BuellNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Kolakowski v. FeeneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Lane v. KarianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Gambee v. DunfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bateman v. Walbridge Aldinger Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Hennard v. BoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Mcnabb v. Oot Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Lopez v. Strober King Building Supply Centers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003