Legal Opinion
Vogel v. Pardon
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 17, 1989No. Civ. 880231PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Anton and Ruth Vogel appeal from a district court judgment awarding them damages for waste arising out of the sale of an apartment building. We affirm. .
In 1981 the Vogels sold an apartment building in Bismarck to Richard Pardon, Paul Rasmussen, Ronald Klein and A. Gay-lord Folden [hereinafter “the Partners”] on a contract for deed. The Partners quit making payments in September 1985, and the Vogels subsequently canceled the contract for deed by notice, pursuant to Chapter 32-18, N.D.C.C. The cancellation was effective March 31, 1986. The Partners quit-claimed the property…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- John N. Fortier and Linda M. Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners, James A. Peterson, Peterson Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Pleasure Time, Inc. v. KussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Donna Crossman v. Michael MarcoccioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Meyer v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nesvig v. NesvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Huber v. Oliver CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Prue v. Royer, Sr., and Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Braunberger v. Interstate Engineering, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Lang v. WonnenbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.