Duncan v. Grady
California Supreme Court
Motion to dimiss an appeal and for damages. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal because of the failure of defendants to file a transcript within the time prescribed by rule 2 of this court, and for damages. The appeal is from a judgment rendered against defendants for the sum of $1,233.35, and was perfected by the filing of an undertaking on appeal on June 24, 1893, and no transcript on appeal has been filed in this court; and it further appears from the certificate of the clerk of the superior court, dated August 23, 1893, that the defendants have not requested him to certify to any copy of the record. Upon these facts the appeal…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Buckley v. StebbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by4 opinions
- Koelling v. RutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Colon v. TosettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Von Schroeder v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Crouse-Prouty v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910