Legal Opinion

Hassell v. Workman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 7, 1953No. 35598PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

In 1945, plaintiff in error and the defendant in error, Robert F. Workman, purchased, along with other property, two adjoining lots in Oklahoma City, with a building thereon suitable for use as a warehouse. This investment appears to have been in the nature of a joint adventure, wherein plaintiff in error originally furnished all of the money for the purchase price of these properties and title thereto was taken in his name, with the understanding that Workman was to manage them and reimburse his said joint adventurer in one-half of the amount of the original investment and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. StanfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Willard v. WillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Holland v. ShafferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Hargis v. HargisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. McInteer v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. De Mik v. CargillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  2. Daughtrey v. DaughtreyMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Carter v. CarterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Mauch v. MauchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Rodkey v. ReesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API