Legal Opinion

Arthur Alonzo Mares v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1963No. 7254PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.

Appellant was convicted upon the verdict of a jury of the illegal, possession of a sawed-off shotgun made in violation of the National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. § 5821 and § 5851. 1

By timely motions to suppress evidence, for acquittal, in arrest of judgment and for a new trial, the following contentions were presented by the appellant to the trial court, and are relied upon in this appeal for reversal: (1) That the evidence was insufficient to authorize the conviction; (2) that 26 U.S.C. § 5851 is unconstitutional as requiring self-incrimination contrary to the Fifth…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Rios v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Arthur Earl Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Kenneth E. Waters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  4. United States v. Clyde Marvin Thompson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. Miles Edward Haynes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API