Arthur Alonzo Mares v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.
Appellant was convicted upon the verdict of a jury of the illegal, possession of a sawed-off shotgun made in violation of the National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. § 5821 and § 5851. 1
By timely motions to suppress evidence, for acquittal, in arrest of judgment and for a new trial, the following contentions were presented by the appellant to the trial court, and are relied upon in this appeal for reversal: (1) That the evidence was insufficient to authorize the conviction; (2) that 26 U.S.C. § 5851 is unconstitutional as requiring self-incrimination contrary to the Fifth…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Rios v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Arthur Earl Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Kenneth E. Waters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Clyde Marvin Thompson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Miles Edward Haynes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.