Legal Opinion

Katauskas v. Lonstein

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 23, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

Peter Katauskas brought two petitions to enforce liens for labor furnished and materials used in the construction of certain buildings on land owned by David M. Burnett and Margaret M. Burnett. One petition was based on a contract made by David M. Burnett with the petitioner for the erection of a garage, and the other was based on a contract between the same parties for the construction of another building. The respondent Lonstein held a mortgage on these premises.

Katauskas also brought a suit in equity against Lonstein (case No. 34371) to which, by amendment, David M. Burnett was made one of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lumiansky v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Adams & Powers Co. v. SederMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lampasona v. CapriottiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. East Coast Steel Erectors, Inc. v. CiolfiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. McRobbie v. Registrars of Voters of IpswichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. Blount Bros. v. Mondev Mass., Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API