Johnston v. City of Kingman
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This was an action to enjoin the governing body of a city from diverting the waters of a stream. Judgment was for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.
*132The Ninnescah river flows eastward through the city of Kingman. In 1881 the Ninnescah Water and Power Company condemned land for the right of way and constructed a millrace. This millrace commenced west of the city of Kingman and ran in a southeasterly direction, roughly paralleling the river to a point a little over a mile east of the city, where it discharged back into the river. At the point where…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gayetty v. BethuneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
- Clark v. AllamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Vossen v. DautelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
3Cited by3 opinions
- Van Sandt v. RoysterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Chinn v. StraitSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- In re the Protest of BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014