Legal Opinion

Johnston v. City of Kingman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1935No. 31,952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action to enjoin the governing body of a city from diverting the waters of a stream. Judgment was for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

*132The Ninnescah river flows eastward through the city of Kingman. In 1881 the Ninnescah Water and Power Company condemned land for the right of way and constructed a millrace. This millrace commenced west of the city of Kingman and ran in a southeasterly direction, roughly paralleling the river to a point a little over a mile east of the city, where it discharged back into the river. At the point where…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gayetty v. BethuneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  2. Clark v. AllamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Vossen v. DautelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Van Sandt v. RoysterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Chinn v. StraitSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  3. In re the Protest of BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API