Legal Opinion

Beaman v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 21, 1953No. 170Published

1Opinion of the Court

78 S.E.2d 182 (1953)

238 N.C. 418

BEAMAN

v.

SOUTHERN RY. CO. et al.

No. 170.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 21, 1953.

Paul J. Story, Marion, and Edwin S. Hartshorn, Asheville, for plaintiff appellant.

W. T. Joyner, Raleigh, and Proctor & Dameron, Marion, for defendant appellees.

BARNHILL, Justice.

That the testimony offered by plaintiff, considered in the light most favorable to him, discloses negligence on the part of defendant may be conceded. If the judgment of nonsuit is to be sustained, it must be sustained for the reason plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

O…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Hogsed v. . PearlmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Parker v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. McCune v. Rhodes-Rhyne Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Gibson v. DudleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API