Legal Opinion

Generous v. Generous

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeldock, J.

In an action for a separation brought by plaintiff wife, three motions have been submitted to this court for disposition : (1) motion by defendant to dismiss the complaint under rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action: (2) motion by defendant for a change of venue; (3) motion by plaintiff wife for alimony and counsel fees.

The complaint alleges that defendant has, among other things, accused plaintiff falsely of being unfaithful and unchaste and of having a common-law husband. It also alleges that during the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Condon v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Locke v. PembrokeNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Wainwright & Page, Inc. v. Burr & McAuley, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Bischoff v. BischoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Adoption of E. W. C.New York Surrogate's Court · 1976
  2. Becker v. BeckerNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Lowe v. LoweNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Fleck v. FleckNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API