Legal Opinion

St. Agatha Federal Credit Union v. Ouellette

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 30, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] St. Agatha Federal Credit Union (St.Agatha) appeals from the summary judgment entered in the District Court (Mada-waska, Daigle, J.) in favor of Robert and Theresa Ouellette. St. Agatha contends that the District Court erred in concluding as a matter of law that the 1988 mortgage, pursuant to which this foreclosure action was commenced, did not secure the 1994 note. Because a genuine issue of material fact exists as to the intent of the parties when the Ouellettes signed the 1994 note, and whether the 1994 note is secured by the 1988 mortgage, we vacate the District Court’s entry of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. Guaranty & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Tondreau v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. Bahre v. PearlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. Casco Northern Bank, N.A. v. EdwardsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. Bunker v. BarronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boise Cascade Corp. v. Reliance National Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2000
  2. In re Children of Brittany B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  3. Town of Freeport v. RingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. Haynes v. Donckers (In re Donckers)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2007
  5. PALM AVENUE HIALEAH TRUST v. SIDELINGERDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API