Legal Opinion

John W. McDougall Company v. Atkins

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1957PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

John W. McDougall Company, as a contractor, makes ducts and installs them in buildings. It paid the sales tax on all the sheet metal used, but did not pay any sales tax based on the cost of the labor used in fashioning this sheet metal into ducts. The State exacted an additional payment based on such labor cost. McDougall paid under protest on the theory that it is a tax on labor rather than a sales tax on tangible personalty, and sued to recover the deficiency assessment so paid. The Chancellor upheld the action of the State, and dismissed the bill. McDougall has appealed.

This may seem at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chattanooga Plow Co. v. HaysTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Townsend Electric Co. v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  3. McGarry v. Superior Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re WalshDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
  2. In Re SumerellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1996
  3. R & B Holding Co. v. Christopher Advertising Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. Merchant v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Nelson v. OroscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API