Legal Opinion

Neerings v. Utah State Bar

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1991No. 890088, 890239, 890425 and 890509PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff R. Owen Neerings sought to recover damages caused by the unauthorized publication of private information. Neerings appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants the Utah State Bar and Sydnie Kuhre (“the Bar”). We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

When reviewing an order granting summary judgment, the facts and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from the facts are to be viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.1

Neerings, as part of his application for membership in the Bar, sat for the February 1988 written…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Culp Construction Co. v. Buildmart MallUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Barnard v. Utah State BarUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Espinal v. Salt Lake City Board of EducationUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Alford v. Utah League of Cities & TownsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Allen v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ron Shepherd Insurance, Inc. v. ShieldsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Shipman v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. RuizUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Thayne v. Beneficial Utah, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API