Legal Opinion
WAY v. ARETE AUTOMOBILI CORPORATION
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 20, 2022No. 3:20-cv-13646Unknown
1Opinion
\NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ADAM WAY, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 20-13646 v. OPINION ARETE AUTOMOBILI CORPORATION and VITALY FARGESEN, Defendants. THOMPSON, U.S.D.J. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion for Default Judgment filed by Plaintiff Adam Way (“Plaintiff”) on January 8, 2021 (ECF No. 5), vacated on January 26, 2021 (ECF No. 8), and reinstated on September 8, 2021 (ECF No. 25.) Defendants Arete Automobili Corporation (“Arete”) and Vitaly Fargesen (“Fargesen”) have not opposed. The Court has decided the Motion based on…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Robin Chamberlain v. Vincent C. Giampapa, M.D., Individually and Dba Plastic Surgery Center InternationaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Hritz v. Woma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.