Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Honolulu Plantation Co. v. Tsunoda

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1924No. 1521PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY,' J.

This is a suit in equity for the foreclosure of two mortgages given to the petitioner by one of the respondents, for the setting aside of a judgment of summary possession terminating a lease which was subject to one of the mortgages and for other relief. Tsunoda, the mortgagor-respondent, made no appearance. The other respondents filed answers, without demurring. The cause proceeded to trial. After examination of witnesses for *836several days the complainant moved for leave to amend the bill. This was not objected to by the respondents, the leave was granted and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Findlay v. Hinde & WifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Rumsey v. New York Life InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  3. McCandless v. LansingHawaii Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Territory v. ScullyHawaii Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Beneficial Hawaii, Inc. v. KidaHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Bank of Hawaii v. HorwothHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bank of Hawaii v. Davis Radio Sales & Service, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Honolulu Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. PaoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Honolulu, Ltd. v. BlackwellHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API