Legal Opinion

Territory v. Scully

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to Dismiss Reserved Question. Hon. O. W. Ashford, Judge. '

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

WATSON, J.

John T. Scully, Willmot R. Ohiltou and John H. Fiscber were jointly indicted for conspiracy in the first degree. The defendants Scully and Chilton interposed separate motions to quash the indictment, the motions being made on the same grounds and supported by affidavits identical in all respects. These motions came on to be heard on October 28, the Scully motion being taken up first, when the deputy city and county attorney, for the government, interposed an oral demurrer to said motion, whereupon the court, by consent of parties, reserved and ordered to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. McCandless v. LansingHawaii Supreme Court · 1909
  3. United States v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. United States v. CandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. The Queen v. PoorHawaii Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Honolulu Plantation Co. v. TsunodaHawaii Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Territory v. McVeaghHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Territory v. LowHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Makainai v. LalakeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API