Legal Opinion

York v. Cooper

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1962No. 36190PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

Arthur F. York and Hazel B. York, his wife, and Charles F. Cooper and Lucetta D. Cooper, his wife, own adjoining residence properties in the city of Tacoma. Prior to 1929, the former owners established a mutual easement from North Warner Street to the east boundary line of their respective properties, extending 4% feet onto the property of the Coopers and 3 feet on the property of the Yorks. Approximately 30 feet of the 7%-foot area, beginning at the sidewalk on North Warner Street, were paved. The easement was used for the primary purpose of ingress and egress for vehicular deliveries of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scott v. WallitnerWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Clark v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Tremlin v. TremlinWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Wilder v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Friedlander v. FriedlanderWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Pier 67, Inc. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. United States v. Harry S. Cross, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  4. Hanson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. In Re the Estate of RynningCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API