Kull v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberRy, C. J.
Many errors are assigned in the briefs for the defendants. To take them up seriatim and to consider and dispose of them all would extend this opinion to an unwarrantable length. We shall therefore deal only with the controlling questions presented upon this appeal.
It is seriously argued by the appealing defendants that Ann Kull was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law because she continued to drive upon her right side of the highway at a time when she was aware that the defendant Small was driving his car directly in the path which she must pursue if she continued. No doubt…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- John v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. PineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Zeinemann v. GasserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Frenier v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
- Grover v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Richter v. HoglundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.