Legal Opinion

Flanagan v. Elder

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1956No. 8573PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AYRES, Judge.

This is an action in boundary. Plaintiff and defendant own contiguous lots in the townsite of Mooringsport, Caddo Parish, Louisiana. Plaintiff alleges that the defendant has encroached upon his property and constructed a garage and/or other structure located in part upon property owned by him; that a controversy exists between them as to the precise location of the boundary between their respective properties; that defendant refuses to have the matter of the boundary fixed and determined in an amicable manner, insisting that the improvements rest solely on his own property, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Werk v. Leland UniversitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Perry v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  4. Gray v. CocoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  5. Keay v. New Orleans Canal & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1852

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Action Finance Corporation v. NicholsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Harper v. Home Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. LittletonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Levraea v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Laborde v. MayeuxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API