Werk v. Leland University
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, C. J.
This is an action to recover a part of the price paid by plaintiff for certain real estate bought from defendant. The suit rests upon the theory that there was a shortage in the area of the land sold. Stated more specifically, the complaint is that there were three streets extending across the tract of land described in the deed; for' the area of which streets plaintiff claims a proportionate reduction of the price that he paid for the land. The defendant denies that the streets were included in the area of land described in the deed, and avers that plaintiff knew, when he bid in the property…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Gray v. CocoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Keay v. New Orleans Canal & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1852
- Lallande v. WentzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1866
- Nick v. BautovichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
3Cited by32 opinions
- Young v. StevensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
- Action Finance Corporation v. NicholsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Tennent v. CafferySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Casso v. Ascension Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Harper v. Home Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.