National State Bank of Newark v. The United States. The Bowery Savings Bank v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
LARAMORE, Judge.
These actions come to us after having been consolidated for the sole purpose of resolving the issues raised by defendant’s motions to dismiss. Both plaintiffs are banks seeking to recover additional mortgage insurance benefits pursuant to contracts with the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). Defendant has moved to dismiss their claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and on the additional ground in the National State Bank of Newark action, that plaintiff has failed to state a cause of action over which this court has jurisdiction. The substance…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Buchanan v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Porter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Slattery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Onilea Neal v. Robert BerglandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Butz Engineering Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Connolly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.