Burr Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,
The appeal is from the allowance by an orphans’ court of a claim for nursing and housekeeping. The single question is whether or not claimant overcame the presumption of periodic payments. A majority of the court ruled that she did. One Judge dissented.
At the audit the issue was beclouded by the inapt preliminary statement of counsel for claimant concerning the nature of the claim. He stated that the claim was based upon quantum meruit. He did, however, refer to an alleged agreement. It is well settled that where a claim is made upon an express contract…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cridge's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Witten v. StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Cramer v. McKinneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- McCaskey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Bemis Et Ux. v. Van Pelt, Exr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Beisgen EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Fahringer v. Strine EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Loutzenhiser v. DoddoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Zawada v. Pennsylvania System Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- In Re Barnes FoundationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.