Legal Opinion

Tucker v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 6, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

This case has been certified to us by the Springfield Court of Appeals. Upon a motion for rehearing, in a per curiam opinion, it is said, that the Springfield Court of Appeals has concluded that their opinion is in conflict with the case of Hobart-Lee Tie Co. v. Stone, 135 Mo. App. 438, decided by the St. Louis Court of Appeals, and by order made certified the present case to this court for that reason.

The Court of Appeals in effect rnled that the plaintiffs’ petition stated no cause of action under the statute relied upon, i. e. Section 3174, Revised Statutes 1909, now Section 9975, Revised…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hobart-Lee Tie Co. v. StoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rider v. JulianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. State Ex Rel. Ashby v. Cairo Bridge & Terminal Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  3. New Britain Transportation Co. v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API