Legal Opinion

United States v. W.H.I., Inc.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided June 16, 1994No. 89-K-1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, Senior District Judge.

In this motion, Defendants W.H.I., Inc. and Michael and Virginia McGee (collectively “Defendants”), seek summary judgment on their affirmative defense that the New Castle Cemetery Road (the “Road”), the road at issue in this action was abandoned or vacated by action of the Garfield County Commissioners several decades ago. I deny the motion because this case is not suitable for summary treatment. Genuine issues of fact and disputed questions of intent require a trial. Nevertheless, I think a full discussion now will help limit the issues…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sterlane v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. Uhl v. McEndafferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  5. Koenig v. GainesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heath v. ParkerColorado Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API