Olefsky v. Ludwig
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event.. The trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury, at the request of the attorney for the defendant, that “ heedlessness ” and “ recklessness ” under the Connecticut statute (Gen. Stat. Conn. [Revision 1930] § 1628) limiting the liability of the owner or operator of a motor vehicle to guests involved more than ordinary negligence. (Ascher v. Friedman, Inc., 110 Conn. 1; Rindge v. Holbrook, 111 id. 72; Latham v. Hankey, 117 Conn. 5; 166 Atl. 400; People v. Grogan, 260 N. Y. 138; People v. Angelo,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. GroganNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Robb v. Hackley & WeltonNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Ascher v. H. E. Friedman, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Latham v. HankeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Raub v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Rogers v. VreelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Kuser v. BarengoNevada Supreme Court · 1953
- Webb v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.