Legal Opinion

Department of Natural Resources v. Parish

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1976No. Docket No. 25517PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. J. Hoehn, J.

Plaintiff, Department of Natural Resources (hereinafter DNR), appeals as of right *747from an order of accelerated judgment entered on behalf of the defendants.

On November 10, 1974, agents of the plaintiff seized two boats, a quantity of gill nets and some 3,000 lbs. of lake trout from the defendants. On May 6, 1975 the plaintiff initiated proceedings to condemn the property seized under the authority of MCLA 300.14; MSA 13.1224. The defendants responded by filing a motion for accelerated judgment stating the following grounds:

“1. That the claim is barred by Article VI [sic] of the United States…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. One 1971 Opel G. T., Engine No. 77228077, California License No. 194 CQEDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1973
  5. United States v. a Quantity of Gold JewelryDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. EverardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In Re Forfeiture of One 1983 CadillacMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. In Re Forfeiture of Cash and Gambling ParaphernaliaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. In re Forfeiture of $109,901Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. County of Saginaw v. CergnulMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API