Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Investigation No. 83-30557
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided December 22, 1983No. GJ 83-4PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VINING, District Judge.
In this case Gobel Mattingly and Robert Seay have moved to intervene in a grand jury investigation currently taking place, in the Northern District of Georgia. The movants have also requested the postponement of the grand jury proceedings in order to permit them the opportunity to gather evidence supporting their claim of an attorney-client privilege. Following oral argument on this motion, on December 16, 1983, the court granted the movants’ motion to intervene but denied their request for a postponement of the grand jury proceedings.
This grand jury investigation…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Garner v. WolfinbargerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. In the Matter of Andrew C. Pavlick. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. GrafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- In Re: Grand Jury Subpoenas, Jane Roe and John Doe. Intervenor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Maplewood Partners, L.P. v. Indian Harbor InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- In re Bevill, Bresler & Schulman Asset Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.