Legal Opinion

Lucy W. Fox v. Heilig-Meyers Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1982No. 81-2054PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff Lucy W. Fox brought suit against Heilig-Meyers Company, alleging violations of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667e, and Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. pt. 226. In her motion for summary judgment, Fox abandoned all of her claims except that asserting disclosure of misleading or confusing additional information in violation of 12 C.F.R. section 226.6(c). After the trial court granted the plaintiff’s motion and entered judgment in her favor in the amount of $675.80 plus $500.00 in attorney’s fees, Heilig-Meyers filed this appeal.

On July 23, 1980,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. David Gambardella v. G. Fox & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Joyce Stewart v. Ford Motor Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Reid v. Finance One of Virginia, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1983
  4. David Gambardella v. G. Fox & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. David Gambardella v. G. Fox & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API