Legal Opinion

Vanderporten v. Slutsky

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1949Published

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

This is a motion by the defendants to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 5 of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice, and for alternátive relief that paragraphs numbered eleventh and thirteenth of the complaint be stricken out pursuant to the provisions of rule 103 of the Buies of Civil Practice.

In a motion predicated upon rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice, the complaint is to be liberally construed (Civ. Prac. Act, § 275), and if upon any theory the plaintiff is entitled to a recovery, the motion to dismiss the complaint should be denied (Dyer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Condon v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. David v. FaymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. David v. FaymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. Rosenbluth v. SackadorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API